Διαδικτυακή επανάσταση εναντίον της παρακμής και της βλακείας!
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Orthodoxy. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Orthodoxy. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων

Τετάρτη 9 Φεβρουαρίου 2011

one can’t learn to pray sitting in a warm armchair

Mία πολύ ενδιαφέρουσα συζήτηση με τον π. Γαβριήλ Bunge, ο οποίος ζει ασκητικά στην απομονωμένη Σκήτη του Τιμίου Σταυρού σε ένα δάσος κοντά στο χωριό Capriasca της Νότιας Ελβετίας.Δυστηχώς για την ωρα μόνο στα αγγλικά ,μπορείτε όμως να διαβάσετε καποια άλλη του συνέντευξη εδω στα Ελληνικά.

A Catholic hermit converted to Orthodoxy

A well-known theologian, hieromonk Gabriel Bunge, rarely gives interviews. He leads a hermit’s life in a small skete in Switzerland, never uses the Internet, and the only means of communication with him is the telephone. The latter works as the answering machine in a distant room. If you want to talk with him, you have to leave a message with the time when you are going to phone again, and if Father Gabriel is ready to talk, he will be near the telephone at the time you specified. We were lucky not to go through this complex operation because we met Father Gabriel in Moscow. On August 27, he converted to Orthodoxy from Catholicism.

In our conversation, Father Gabriel told us about the motives for his decision, about the main differences between Valaam and Switzerland, and about many other things.

“We Are Like Weirdos”

Q: If someone comes from one Christian tradition to another, it must mean that they feel they lack something vital in their spiritual life…

A: Yes. And if this person is seventy years old, like me, this step cannot be called a hasty one, can it?

Q: No, it can’t. But what did you lack, being a monk with such a great spiritual experience?

A: I have to speak not of one decision, but of the whole life journey with its inner logic: at one point an event happens which was being prepared by one’s whole life.

Like all young people, I was searching for my way in life, so to speak. I entered the University in Bonn and started studying philosophy and comparative theology. Not long before that, I had visited Greece and spent two months on the island of Lesbos. It was there that I saw a real Orthodox monastic elder for the first time. At that time, I was already inwardly being drawn to monasticism and had read some Orthodox literature, including Russian sources. That elder amazed me. He became the incarnation of the monastic that I had come across only in books before. Suddenly, in front of me, I saw a monastic life which from the very beginning seemed to be authentic, true, the closest to the first Christian monks’ practice. Afterwords, I was in touch with that elder my whole life. So I got an ideal of monastic life.

When I came back to Germany, I joined the Order of Saint Benedict – it seemed to be the closest to my aspirations. The structure of the Order itself resembles one of the early Christian Church. In the Order, there is no vertical system of subordination, each community exists on its own. What guarantees the unity of these communities is the tradition and the Church Typicon. That is, not the juridical order but the spiritual ideal. By the way, in this sense I think that it is the Benedictines, of all Western believers, who are ready to understand the Orthodox believers most keenly. But still my spiritual Father and I saw very soon that with my fancy for Eastern monasticism and the love of Eastern Christianity on the whole, I was not in my proper place in this Order. So the abbot, an elderly and experienced man I still honor, decided to transfer me to a small monastery in Belgium, and not without regret. I spent 18 years there, acquired great experience, and from there, with a blessing, I went to the skete in Switzerland. All those transfers were caused by one reason: the attempt to progress to authentic monastic life, as it was with early Christians. Like the one I saw with Eastern Christians.The most recent step on this way was the conversion to Orthodoxy.

Q: Why did you decide to adopt it? One can love Orthodoxy with all one’s heart and stay within the traditional Catholicism. There are many such examples in the West.

A: Yes, many people who are drawn to Orthodoxy stay within the Catholic Church. And this is normal. In the majority of Western cathedrals there are Orthodox icons. In Italy, there are professional schools of icon painting taught by Russian specialists and others. More and more believers in Europe are interested today in Byzantine hymns. Even the traditionalists of the Catholic Church have been discovering Byzantine singing. Of course they do not use them during the divine service in the church, but outside of the church, for example, at concerts. Orthodox literature gets translated into all European languages, and the books are published in the major Catholic publishing houses. In short, in the West they really have not lost the taste for all authentic, Christian, that the Eastern tradition has preserved. But, alas, it changes nothing in real life of people and society on the whole. The interest in Orthodoxy is more cultural. And those wretched people like me who have a spiritual interest in Orthodoxy, are left in the minority. We are like weirdos; we are seldom understood.

“Simply to Know Where Everything Comes From”

Q: As a theologian, you have often spoken on the problem of West and East’s separation. Can we say that your conversion to Orthodoxy is the result of your meditation on this topic?

A: When I was in Greece and started turning towards Eastern Christianity, I began to perceive the schism between the East and the West very painfully. It stopped being an abstract theory or a plot in a Church history book, but rather something that was directly affecting my spiritual life. This is why the conversion to Orthodoxy started looking like a very logical step. In youth, I sincerely hoped that the union of the Western and the Eastern Christianity was possible. I was waiting for it to happen with all my heart. And I had some reasons to believe in it. At the Second Vatican Council, there were observers from the Russian Orthodox Church, including the current Metropolitan of Saint Petersburg and Ladoga Vladimir (Kotlyarov). At that time Metropolitan Nikodim (Rotov) was very active in international affairs. And many people thought that the two Churches were moving towards each other and would eventually meet at one point. It was my dream that was becoming more and more real. But as I was growing older and learning some things deeper, I stopped believing in the possibility of the reconciliation of two Churches in terms of the divine services and institutional unity. What was I to do? I could only go on searching for this unity on my own, individually, restoring it in one separate soul, mine. I could not do more. I just followed my conscience, and came to Orthodoxy.

Q: Isn’t it too radical an opinion?

A: While still in Greece, being a Catholic, I realized that it was the West that separated from the East, not vice versa. At that moment, it was unthinkable for me. I needed time to understand and accept this. I cannot blame anyone, of course I can’t! We are talking about a whole big historic process, and we cannot say that this or that person is to blame for this. But facts remain facts: what we call Western Christianity today was born as a chain of ruptures with the East. These ruptures were the Gregorian reform, followed by the separation of the churches in the XI century, then the Reformation in the XV century, and finally the Second Vatican Council in the XX century. This is, surely, a very rough scheme, but I think it is correct on the whole.

Q: However, there is an opinion that the chain of these ruptures is a normal historic process because any phenomenon (and Christian Church is no exception) goes through its stages of development. What’s the tragedy in that?

A: The tragedy is in the people. In a situation of radical, revolutionary events there always appear people who start to divide life into ‘before’ and ‘after.’ They want to start counting only from this new point as if everything that happened before had no meaning. When the future Protestants proclaimed the Reformation, I do not think they knew it would lead to the separation of the Western Church into two big camps. They did not realize it, they just acted. And they began to divide those around them into the healthy ones – those who accepted the Reformation – and the unhealthy, sick ones – the followers of Pope.

Moreover, history repeats itself: the same is happening now around the Second Vatican Council within the Roman Catholic Church. There are people who did not accept its decisions and people who consider it to be some kind of a starting point. And everybody reasons along those lines. A simple example: if in a conversation, someone mentions ‘council’ without any additional details, everybody automatically assumes that they are talking about the Second Vatican Council.

Q: What’s your opinion on the modern liberal moods among Catholics?

A: I am very glad to have the opportunity to address myself to the Russian audience and say that you should not reduce all Catholics to one level. Among them are such who would like to be more secular, more liberal. It does not mean they are criminals, it’s just their point of view on life. There are others, those who are fully dedicated to tradition. I would not call them traditionalists, because tradition itself is not so important to them. This is not an ancient folklore that one must nourish artificially and keep aswim. No! Tradition to them is what in every epoch ensured and still ensures live personal contact with Christ, everyday living in God’s hands. As John the Theologian said, “That which we have seen and heard we declare to you, that you also may have fellowship with us; and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ” (1 John 1:3). I am sure that the position “there is God and there is me” is for heretics. For Christians, it is “God, me and everyone else.” Everyone else is other believers, and those who for many centuries have preserved the faith for us. If people had not listened to other people so devotedly, if they had not written it down and had not passed it on, there would have been no New Testament. It means there would have been nothing…

Q: And what, in this case, should our attitude be to those who are not very dedicated to tradition?

A: We should not beat them in the face and of course we should not chase them out of the Church. Any person deserves Christian mercy. If I, being an Orthodox, saw a Catholic in an Orthodox church, I would like to approach him and tell him openly, softly, and confidentially, “Listen, brother, you might be interested to know that in the beginning we all crossed ourselves in this way: from right to left. Now everything has changed. No, I am not calling you to reconsider all your life and rush to the Orthodox Church. I just want you to know where things came from.”

Valaam

Q: And why did you choose the Russian Orthodox Church?

A: I think the key factor in such decisions is the people who surround you. When my acquaintances, Russian bishops from Saint Petersburg, learned I was adopting Orthodoxy, they said, “We are not in the least surprised! You’ve always been with us. But now we are going to have closer communion, a sacred one – at one Chalice.” I’ve known Metropolitan Hilarion, the current head of the Department for external church relations of Moscow Patriarchate, for a long time. We first met in 1994 when he was a hieromonk. I consider him to be my good friend and I cherish this friendship.

Hierarch Hilarion, if you will, is one of the most competent and knowledgeable people I’ve ever met. He actually became for me the only person I could turn to with my request, who knew me, my beliefs and my situation. And who, as I was sure, was ready to respond. And that’s what happened.

Q: How will it help you in reaching your ideal of spiritual life?

A: You want prophecy from me, but I am no prophet. I do not know specifically what will happen next. We shall simply live. Even now I have already found in Russia many things that keep me interested.

For example, I visited Valaam. You know, in the West if a believer is drawn to a life utmost monastic seclusion, he actually has nowhere to go.

Hermitages such as they are in Russia, do not exist in the West. This form of life seems to be outdate already. As a monk I am constantly in search for the utmost seclusion, even loneliness. In Valaam, I felt all of it was there.

Q: Isn’t there enough loneliness in your skeet in Switzerland? Valaam is also a crowded place, pilgrims come there regularly.

A: Switzerland is a small and densely populated country. The skete is surrounded by a forest, but in a 15 minutes walk there is a village with approximately a hundred people living there. In Valaam it is much more quiet. Yes, of course, there are many people there. But the place itself, as I felt, is isolated from the rest of the world. Maybe it is so because it is an island, or maybe it is due to other, non-geographic reasons.

It seems to me that all this can give rise to this desirable state of seclusion in the heart of everyone who comes there.

Q: Is it more difficult in Europe?

A: To put it roughly, we can say this does not exist in the West altogether. The authentic monastic tradition in the West was practically stamped out in the course of the French bourgeois revolution in 1789. I have a firm belief that the consequences of this revolution for Europe were no less heavy than the consequences of the 1917 revolution and the 70 years of atheist power for Russia. In France after those bloody events monasticism had to be restored almost from scratch. Common priests, not monks, were to perform this. There was no one else. In Russia monasticism survived in-spite of all the shocks and horrors. Yes, it happened at the level of particular individuals, namely, elders. But they existed! And they kept the spiritual tradition and authentic monastic life. It seems to me that in everything that concerns monastic life, Russia did not have to start from scratch. This is why I am sorry to hear Russians say sometimes “we had it all destroyed, the Church was stamped out, etc.” I always want to respond, “On my opinion, you have it all, new martyrs and confessors, monastic elders.” And they are all near, just stretch out your arm. Only you have to stretch it out, take this wealth and use it in practice, so to speak, in your life. I often get the impression that the majority of people in Russia do not value this. Or they just do not understand that this is valuable.

Q: Why, in your opinion, does it happen so?

A: Speaking of problems, people concentrate on material, at times external difficulties that monasteries and the Church face nowadays. Yes, there is much to reconstruct. But this is only the technical part, so to speak, only the walls and the roofs. It goes without saying, people complain: roofs and walls cost money, and where can one find money… But if we mentally go above the roof – let it be with holes – we shall see that the walls is not the main thing, it’s more important with what kind of heart one enters the walls. The Russian saying goes, “The church is not in the logs but in the ribs.” And this is the most important thing, this spiritual tradition, that is still within Russians. Monastic elders and new martyrs preserved all of this for us. Sometimes people argue, “But there are so few elders now, most of them died already. There is no one to teach us.” I always respond, “If you have no living elder to teach you, turn to the deceased one. You have his hagiography, his texts, his teachings. Read them, and correlate with your life. I don’t mean to say that I have never met people in Russia who know, value, and cherish this knowledge. There are many, many people who do and my visit to Valaam proved it.

Jump into the Water

Q: What must change now in your daily life after the conversion?

A: Of course, there are things that cannot but change. Having become a member of the Russian Orthodox Church but still living in Switzerland, I submit to Archbishop Innokenty of Korsun. My relations with the Catholic Church cannot, naturally, remain the same.

Q: What reaction do you expect from your spiritual children? They must be all Catholics…

A: Firstly, I fortunately deal with good understanding people, and I am sure they will respect my decision. And secondly, I have never kept my opinions and beliefs in secret. All my spiritual children have known that my ideal of Christianity is in the East. I do not think they will be that surprised. I had not said anything to them beforehand to avoid unnecessary discussions. But I do not think anything extraordinary will happen. I believe that the tradition of spiritual talks my children used to come for will remain, I have no reason to stop it. Finally, people I communicate with regularly share my spiritual ideal more or less; otherwise, they would not be coming.

Q: What about divine services?

A: Of course, from now on I won’t be able to administer communion to Catholics. But even before I used to do it very seldom: the skete is away from the big world, the territory is kept locked, the services are also private, the chapel is small – for ten people at the most. Only at Christmas and Easter we open the doors for everyone who wants to join us.

Q: If you could and wanted to give contemporaries a very short piece of advice about organizing their praying life, what would you say?

A: If you want to learn to swim, jump into the water. Only that way you can learn. Only the one who prays will feel the meaning, the taste and the joy of prayer. You can’t learn to pray sitting in a big warm armchair. If you are ready to kneel, to repent sincerely, to raise your eyes and hands to Heaven, then many things will be revealed to you. Of course you can read many books, listen to lectures, talk to people – these are also important and help to understand more. But what is the value of all these things if we don’t take any real steps afterwards? If we don’t start praying? I think you must understand this, too. Obviously, you are asking this question from the position of one who does not believe…

Q: Exactly. Our magazine is for those who doubt.

A: There is nothing wrong with doubts, they are even useful. One should not search for them, however. But if they do appear, one must simply recall that we all have a chance to hear, “Reach your finger, and behold My hands; and reach your hand, and put it into my side: and do not be unbelieving, but believing” (John 20: 27).


πηγή:foma.

Πέμπτη 8 Απριλίου 2010

Greek Protestants ask: Why be Orthodox?



By N. M., former heretic group leader




This question, which may seem so unnatural to a Greek Orthodox faithful, is of great importance to another Greek, who does NOT believe in the Orthodox faith, or has little to do with it. As a former founder of a Greek Protestant group and now converted to Orthodoxy, I believe it is worth giving an answer to this question, from within my personal, past experience, from the point of view of a Greek Protestant and a formerly avowed enemy of the Orthodox Church.

So, the question is: How does a Greek Protestant view Orthodoxy? And what does it take, for him to appreciate it?

Special note to readers: This article is chiefly directed at Greek Protestants and not to Protestants worldwide in general (where the majority of the populations are historically Protestant)

1. A negative image of Greek Orthodoxy

When Greek Protestant pastors refer to the Orthodox Church here in Greece, it is almost always in a critical spirit. And it is a fact, that from a pious westerner’s point of view, they find many things in the Orthodox Church of Greece that are annoying. Let us therefore first take a look at some basic things that a Greek Protestant finds annoying, out of what he observes in the Orthodox Church in Greece.

1.1 The ignorance of the “mob”

When a Greek Protestant converses with a chance Greek Orthodox, and begins to set out various arguments (usually from within the Holy Bible), in most cases he will have before him a totally ignorant person; usually one who has not “had a taste” of the Christian faith and quite often just a fanatical “follower”, but not a conscientious faithful. It is a fact, that the average Greek Orthodox is usually less involved with the Orthodox Church than he is with his favourite soccer team, or with foreign literature, or with science, or with...Buddhism. Thus, in the eyes of that Protestant, that person will not be perceived as someone who does not know Orthodoxy, but as a representative of…Orthodoxy! They tend to “look down” on Protestants, just like the Pharisees’ attitude in the time of Christ, who used to say: “…this mob who does not know the law – accursed be it!...” (John 7:49).

1.2 The deficiency observed in the Presbyters

In the eyes of a Greek Protestant, the scandals of the Orthodox clergy convince him even more, of the correctness of his choice of “anything rather than Orthodoxy”. Almost each and every priest is seen by them as an “enemy”, “a mercenary of the enemy”, a “fraud”, a “predator wolf”, “immoral” and an “exploiter”. Most of all though, it is the fanaticism and animosity that is apparent or purposely displayed by some of them, that constitutes the most repulsive factor.

1.3 The lack of parish solidarity

While most Greek Protestants have warm social relationships in their congregations, in most Greek Orthodox parishes exactly the opposite is observed. Parishioners feel like strangers amongst strangers, and this, to a Greek Protestant, is proof of a lack of Christian love – something that he feels exists in the minority assemblies of his own particular group, where everybody knows everybody, and where there is much closer contact between them, due to their common particularities.

1.4 The mode of worship

Greek Protestants regard the Orthodox mode of worship as “a thing apart from the Bible”. They have a resentment towards Orthodox icons, psalm-singing, temples, sacraments, vestments, services, holy canons, etc.. Whatever they have been taught as not belonging to the “proto-Christian, Scriptural” model of worship, they will not accept as Christianically “valid” and will refer to it as “traditions of men”. Moreover, they are annoyed by the “recklessness” that seems to prevail in Greek Orthodox life and worship - both among the laity as well as among the clergy – as well as the attitudes thereof. Being accustomed as they are to the disciplined life of their group, they regard the local Orthodox faith more like a “transit area”.

From the above, it is obvious that the local Protestants (but also the Western-raised, local “Orthodox” of our time, who have objections of their own about our faith) focus mainly on the phenomena – the visible “symptoms”. They do not delve in depth, into the causes that underlie every phenomenon. They remain on the surface of the issue, and its essence inevitably escapes them. They generalize the “whole” and overlook the “components”. They are also oblivious to certain important parameters of the Christian faith, and have never asked themselves “how valid are some of the things that they were taught as given” in Protestantism.

As a result, they fail to even TRY to see the things from the Orthodox viewpoint; Because this would have been the only way that they would have been able to perceive Orthodoxy’s grandeur. If one doesn’t try to understand the other, along with the way he thinks, one will never be able to comprehend the other’s behaviour or the “symptoms” behind his faith, in depth. This is the reason that – before replying to the question “why be an Orthodox?” - I had wished to firstly show what repels a Western-raised Greek in Orthodoxy, locally.
Having unfolded the reasons that used to make me hate Orthodoxy, I shall now proceed to describe briefly what made me love Orthodoxy and led me to disband the heretical group that I had created in my ignorance, and to thereafter join the Lord in the Orthodox Church.

2. The source of the Christian Faith

The first basic thing that constitutes a sufficient and serious reason for one to be a Christian (in the broad sense of the word) Orthodox, is to comprehend the significance of the source of the faith.
A Protestant is taught (and he has accepted, without any supporting verification and documentation whatsoever) that the source of the Christian faith is supposedly the Holy Bible, and that nothing else is to be accepted, outside of the Bible. In fact, a Protestant even believes that the Holy Bible consists of 66 books, without ever being given any explanation as to why Protestantism has omitted from the Bible those other 10 Books, which are acknowledged by Orthodoxy.
When such a person finds out that the Holy Bible has 10 more books, and also that the Holy Bible is NOT the sole “source of the Christian faith”, but instead, that the source of the Christian faith is the perennial experience of the Church “in the Holy Spirit” (which we call “Holy Tradition”), and that the New Testament had been compiled in the 4th century A.D. - and in fact by the Orthodox Church - that person is then inevitably at a loss. He can sense that “something is not right” in what Protestantism had taught him as being “true” and “indisputable”. The very basis of his faith will be irreparably destroyed. It will now be obvious to him, that it is absurd to reject the Orthodox Church who provided him with the Holy Bible, and only accept the Holy Bible, which was a product of the Orthodox Church. And if this person is logical and sincerely loves the truth, he will endeavour to see the things through the Orthodox point of view and thus comprehend why the true “pillar and foundation of the truth” is the Church (1Tim 3:15), and not the Holy Bible.
The Orthodox Church therefore, is that Church which has a CONSISTENT AND STABLE BASIS as the source of faith, as opposed to Protestantism. The Church is supported on the “Holy-Spiritual” life of the saints, and is furthermore witnessed historically, from its beginning, through to this day.

3. Historical witness

In this way, this person will begin his own search for the HISTORICAL Church. Regardless of what assertions someone may have (as to what the early Christians supposedly did or believed in their worship), there are historical records, early Christian texts and archaeological discoveries, which evidence that Christians from the very beginning worshipped God in the Orthodox manner, and not in the Protestant one. There was an acknowledgement of Synods, specialized clergy, icons, vestments, the honouring of saints and holy relics, clearly defined dogmas, Divine Liturgy, Confession, Holy Unction, Chrismation, memorial services, the Crucifix, fasting, feast-days… All these things existed, from the very beginning, with changes being made to the Rubric only in details of minor significance. Should a Protestant discover all this information within the ancient historical sources, he will come to realize that everything he had been taught by his leaders was just an arbitrary and false depiction of the first Christian Church; and he will realize that everything he detested in Orthodox worship as non-Scriptural, is precisely that which was delivered to us by the Lord Himself!!!

Historical research will most assuredly lead a well-intentioned person to Orthodox worship, away from the Protestant concoctions of the 16th century.


4. Apostolic Succession

The following, equally important matter that will help one to understand that they cannot claim something to be “Christian” in nature if it is outside of the Orthodox Church, is the matter of Apostolic Succession. When one studies the ancient Christian sources, one begins to comprehend certain verses of the Holy Scripture; having lacked that knowledge previously, that person would have easily misconstrued or remained ignorant of them. The researcher will come to realize that the Church functions by means of the God-given Synodic system and that this same system is the very guarantor of the unity, the cohesion and the Holy-Spiritual life of the Church.
This study will lead him to perceive that in the Church of Christ, from the very beginning, nobody acted arbitrarily, without having the authority; that there has always been a gradation in authority, which begins with God the Father Himself, continues through the Bishop of every city and terminates at the last Christian. He will then be roused from his Protestant lethargy and realize that the authority of the Bishop is not a “man made” thing, but a basic Christian dogma of faith. He will then begin to question the Protestant leaders’ source of authority (and perhaps even the source of his own authority, if he happens to be acting as a pastor in their meetings). Who, exactly, was it that bestowed them with the authority of minister over the others?
He will also be surprised to find that the Church never apostatized (as someone had informed him), but continues to thrive through History, in perpetual collaboration and union with the Lord Jesus Christ, in the Holy Spirit. And he will even acknowledge this apostolicity as existing ONLY in the Orthodox Church, when he discovers the reasons and the means that brought about the Schism with the Papists. The road to Orthodoxy will thereafter be a one-way street for him.


5. Reliable experiential answers

All of the above information will, by now, have provided that person with reliable answers to everything that he once used to accuse the Orthodox Church of. He will have understood by now the reasons for the “recklessness” observed in many of the Orthodox laity and clergy. He will now have perceived that in a Synodic System (where there is no “pyramidal” hierarchy with absolute, monolithic powers), it is only natural for disagreements and conflicts to occur between bishops on immaterial issues. He will understand that in an unshackled worship, it is only natural to find a plethora of clergy and laity who will exploit that freedom (albeit to their own detriment). And furthermore, that in such a freedom-filled worship, it is only natural for pseudo-Christians and opportunists to exist. This person will have also realized by now that the same things have always been observed in the people of God, and that Christ’s ‘field’ always had, still has, and will continue to have, weeds growing in it!
By now, he will have learnt what, and how, he must believe. In this way, he will understand that instead of criticizing the others’ conduct, it is more prudent for him to focus on his own life and conduct, knowing full well that he never was, nor is he still, the way he should be, before God. And that, instead of waiting for the others to make the first move, it would be better for him to create a circle of faithful brethren around him, with whom he can ensure the Christian fellowship that he desires. After all, he himself is not free of every responsibility towards the others.


6. Dogmatic clarification

Whether or not a Protestant, in the Orthodox Church he will also find something that cannot be found anywhere else. He will find ABSOLUTE DOGMATIC CONSISTENCY. Because, even if one wanted (contrary to nature) to regard Orthodoxy as a “worldly idol”, its superiority would still be grandly obvious - as opposed to any man-made worldly idol, every philosophy, religion or ideology. Because only the Orthodox Church is a REVELATION by God, on issues of life and salvation.

Only in Orthodoxy does one learn the UNIQUE way that God can be recognized as a Persona, as well as the meaning of “Persona” in Jesus Christ.

Only in Orthodoxy does one learn of a proven method of psychotherapy with experimental verification thereof in the person of the saints.

Only in Orthodoxy does one learn why God is Triadic and what the expression “God is love” means.

Only in Orthodoxy can one sense the element of freedom in his worship, and learn the reason for Christ’s sacrifice, away from the fear of an avenger-god.

Only in Orthodoxy can one learn the truth about Hell and Paradise and appreciate the grandeur of God’s love.

Only in Orthodoxy can one savour from the present time the Future Aeon of the Kingdom of God, far away from all the false promises for the future, which have no actual reciprocation in the real world.

All of the above, along with all the components of Orthodox Dogmatics, have such a completeness and reliability that cannot be found anywhere else. Because nowhere else can one find Divine Revelation unadulterated. When Man uses the Orthodox faith as a measure of comparison, he will find every other ideology and foreign dogma entirely inadequate!


7. The Holy-Spiritual life

Finally, as a person settles down in the Orthodox faith and lives the true meaning of Orthodoxy, he is gradually transformed into a likeness of his God and Lord Jesus Christ and he begins to confront his life and his fellow men in a totally different manner – one that cannot be found anywhere else.
He learns to judge himself, not by comparing himself to the “evil and accursed ones of the world” (in order to feel that he is “cleaner” and a “chosen vessel”), but to the PERFECT and ALL HOLY Lord Jesus Christ. Every such comparison will implant humility and a sense of one’s insignificance in one’s soul. That person will have finally perceived how to evaluate the “Christian way”; i.e., that it is not about “snootily criticizing one’s brethren”, but that it is a collective course by mankind, towards the par excellence purpose of its existence. Whenever a faithful looks upon his sinning brother, he will no longer criticize him, but instead, he will HIMSELF feel deeply sorrowed (knowing that he too partakes of that same essence) and will be pained. And he will also be aware that not only that person’s sin, but his also, is fuel that is added to the fire of malice in this world. He will thenceforth pray and repent, instead of criticizing; he will thenceforth perceive the other person’s fall as his own, and will agonize over his brother’s salvation.
Every time he does happen to sin, he will no longer despair, but will turn with hope towards the goodness and the love of God - who was crucified for the sake of the sinner, and not the righteous – and he will pick himself up once again and continue on with his struggle, with renewed strength.
He will seek a PERSONAL relationship, with his brethren, with the uniqueness that distinguishes every human persona, and will not insist on seeing others confined to a standardized, legalistic model of conduct, morality and life. This is why he does not hesitate to beseech blessings from an all-holy saint such as the Theotokos, and at the same time from a (former) murder and rapist saint. He can even enjoy the disorderly manner of worship observed in the Orthodox Church, and instead of feeling offended he can actually admire the free and individual expression of the faith of each unique person in the presence of God, without any standardized preconceptions.
He will bypass the filth in the Church’s garden, preferring to sit in the midst of Her saintly “blossoms” and absorb their vitalizing “sap”; and he will acquire knowledge, according to the talent that the Lord entrusted him with. He will appreciate that Divine Power, which is able to produce flowers in a garden constantly vandalized by all sorts of enemies and adversaries.
And as the person gradually becomes enlightened (ONLY inside the Orthodox Church of the Lord), he will meet with the Lord, “the way He actually is” and along with Him, will experience the transcending of Time, by partaking of the Life of God.
For anyone properly acquainting himself, even briefly, with the grandeur and the depth of the Orthodox faith, and, on placing his footsteps on the path towards salvation and walking even for a short while along with the saints and getting even a small taste of the Water of Life, there will be no return!

Translating: M.D







Επιτρέπεται η αντιγραφή και ιεραποστολική αξιοποίηση των κειμένων πού θα βρείτε εδώ, είτε ημετέρων ή αντεγραμμένων από άλλους ιστοχώρους, ΑΠΟΚΛΕΙΣΤΙΚΑ από ορθόδοξα ή φιλορθόδοξα ιστολόγια με υποχρέωση την αναφορά πηγής και συγγραφέως του κειμένου και την μη περικοπή αυτού για οποιονδήποτε λόγο.Τα ανυπόγραφα άρθρα και όσα δεν αναφέρουν πηγή ανήκουν στο υποφαινόμενο ιστολόγιο.
Συνήθως οι εικόνες πού χρησιμοποιούμε, παρέχονται από την αναζήτηση google.Αν νομίζετε ότι η ανάρτηση τους θίγει δικαιώματα σας, ειδοποιήστε να τις κατεβάσουμε.

Ευχαριστούμε